On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:16:04 GMT, Paul Sandoz <psan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This piece of code follows the pattern:
>>
>> if (uncommonCondition) {
>> return uncommonPath();
>> }
>> // Continue the common path
>>
>> So I think it is better to keep it as it is.
>
> Ok, but since it deviates from the pattern applied in other areas for POT
> checks and caught me out would you mind adding a comment?
Done
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21042#discussion_r1873698256
