On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:26:27 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this simple patch which adds a new external system property 
> `jdk.patched` when the runtime has been patched with the `--patch-module` 
> switch. This is useful for two reasons: 1) it allows one to determine at 
> run-time whether or not `--patch-module` has been used (by querying the said 
> property) 2) allows tools, such as `jlink` doing the same without needing to 
> expose internal properties the JVM sets on initialization.
> 
> Testing:
> 
> - [x] GHA (includes new test)
> - [x] New jtreg test 
> 
> Thoughts?

src/hotspot/share/runtime/arguments.cpp line 2272:

> 2270:       if (res == JNI_OK) {
> 2271:         // Add jdk.patched system property when processing of args was 
> OK
> 2272:         PropertyList_unique_add(&_system_properties, "jdk.patched", 
> "true",

Hello Severin, in addition, should we explicitly set this system property to 
`false` (or remove the system property) when `--patch-module` isn't used? I 
think that would then prevent applications from passing `-Djdk.patched=true` 
when the runtime hasn't been patched. 
While at it, should there be additional guards to prevent applications from 
changing the value of this system property by doing 
`System.setProperty("jdk.patched")` at runtime?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22277#discussion_r1851376171

Reply via email to