On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:22:44 GMT, Aleksei Efimov <aefi...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR permanently disable remote code downloading in JNDI/LDAP and 
>> JNDI/RMI JDK providers, and contains the following changes:
>> - The following two properties are removed:
>>     - `com.sun.jndi.ldap.object.trustURLCodebase`
>>     - `com.sun.jndi.rmi.object.trustURLCodebase`
>> - JNDIs object factories logic has been altered to make it possible to 
>> reconstruct object factories from remote locations when a custom 
>> [ObjectFactoryBuilder](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/23/docs/api/java.naming/javax/naming/spi/ObjectFactoryBuilder.html)
>>  is assigned via the 
>> [NamingManager#setObjectFactoryBuilder](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/23/docs/api/java.naming/javax/naming/spi/NamingManager.html#setObjectFactoryBuilder(javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactoryBuilder))
>>  API.
>> - The `NamingManager` class-level documentation is edited to remove 
>> references to the `SecurityManager`. It was also revised to clarify a 
>> reconstruction mechanism of object factories from remote references in the 
>> presence of a custom `ObjectFactoriesBuilder`.
>> - Also, the modified classes have been cleaned-up from `SecurityManager`, 
>> `doPrivildged`, and `AccessController` usages.
>> 
>> These changes require a CSR that will be submitted soon.
>> 
>> ### Testing
>> - Added a new test to check if NamingManager#setObjectFactoryBuilder can be 
>> used to implement remote code downloading: 
>> `test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/rmi/registry/objects/ObjectFactoryBuilderCodebaseTest.java`
>> - `jdk-tier1` to `jdk-tier3` and other JNDI LDAP/RMI tests show no issue 
>> with the proposed changes.
>
> Aleksei Efimov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   clarify factory location usages in NamingManager and jdk.naming.rmi 
> module-info

The updates looks good to me. Thanks for the clarification.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22154#pullrequestreview-2446536122

Reply via email to