On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:10:59 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziem...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > Rather than having 2 implementations, I'd like to see us aiming for > > > integration for JDK-25 after forking 24, so integration in December. That > > > would give us 6 months of ensuring stability of the new implementation > > > before it reaches any customers. During those 6 months it will go through > > > all of our testing multiple times over, and be used by OpenJDK > > > developers. What do you think of this idea? > > > > > > No objection. We can do this way. > > Thank you Afshin for agreeing and thank you Johan for clearly stating the > arguments. > > I was trying to think of a precedent where we shipped JDK with 2 small > implementation details that were exposed via runtime flags, but nothing comes > to mind... Yes, thank you Afshin for reconsidering. I do sympathise with the goal of ensuring that no user receives a faulty build. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20425#issuecomment-2379664905
