On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:43:19 GMT, Johan Sjölen <jsjo...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Why should the default be disabled? That requires customers to explicitly > pick the new tree to be used, which they are very unlikely to do. As I > understand it, and correct me if I am wrong, the main goal of having two > implementations is the ability to revert back in case we have bugs in the new > one. If the default is to have the new implementation be disabled, then how > are we ever going to find any real use bugs? You are right. This should be defualt = enabled. Anyway, we are not going to have two versions. > I don't believe that we have decided that already. Both me and, I believe, > Gerard have been negative towards the proposal to keep both implementations. > I'd like to use this as an opportunity to discuss the pros and cons of > different approaches, which is why I asked for your opinion on my > alternative. I believe that it is very important that we all agree on the > approach taken, as we will all have to deal with the consequences of that > approach. Sorry for misunderstanding. We go for 1 version only. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20425#issuecomment-2379619838 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20425#issuecomment-2379622866
