> After the ClassFile API migration, when serializable lambdas are requested > for hidden class callers, illegal class name is generated for the > serialization methods, which previously had legal yet unusable class names, > as hidden classes cannot be described by a `CONSTANT_Class_info`. > > This patch restores a similar older behavior of using legal yet unusable > class names. Previously, the invalid `.` in hidden class names was replaced > by a `/` as if a package separator; this patch changes it to a `_` like that > in the generated lambda's class name. > > The bug report shows some unintended and erroneous usages of > `LambdaMetafactory`. To clarify and to persuade against misuse, I added a > paragraph of API notes to `LambdaMetafactory`, describing the impact of this > API being designed to support Java language features. In particular, I used > the scenario where people assumed LMf generates weak hidden classes, which > happened in this issue report and in #12493, that misuse can lead to resource > leaks.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Add a test to ensure serializable lambda creation and basic execution in hidden classes ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21912/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21912/files/08086c42..4e3790a9 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21912&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21912&range=00-01 Stats: 93 lines in 1 file changed: 93 ins; 0 del; 0 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21912.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21912/head:pull/21912 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21912
