On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 00:15:24 GMT, Brent Christian <bchri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411 >> - Change apiNote to deprecated annotation on checkAccess methods. Change >> method dedescription to "Does nothing". >> - Sanitize the class descriptions of DelegationPermission and >> ServicePermission >> by removing text that refers to granting permissions, but avoid changes >> that >> affect the API specification, such as the description and format of input >> parameters. >> - Restored methods in RMIConnection to throw SecurityExceptions again but >> with adjusted text that avoids the word "permission". >> - Add text to class description of MBeanServer stating that implementations >> may throw SecurityException if authorization doesn't allow access to >> resource. >> - Restore text about needing permissions from the desktop environment in the >> getPixelColor and createScreenCapture methods. >> - Add api note to getClassContext to use StackWalker instead and >> add DROP_METHOD_INFO option to StackWalker. >> - Change checkAccess() methods to be no-ops, rather than throwing >> SecurityException. >> - Merge >> - Merge >> - ... and 87 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f50bd0d9...f89d9d09 > > src/java.prefs/share/classes/java/util/prefs/AbstractPreferences.java line 93: > >> 91: * static {@link ThreadLocal} instance. Authors of such implementations >> are >> 92: * <i>strongly</i> encouraged to determine the user at the time >> preferences >> 93: * are accessed (for example by the {@link #get(String,String)} or {@link > > Most of this seems like it will remain applicable. Of course we won't suggest > throwing `SecurityException`. But users not having sufficient OS-level > privileges will still need to be addressed, yes? This text was restored. See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21498/commits/66145173cce201b655845144daa209a75ad5964a ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21498#discussion_r1820732961
