On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:20:01 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR proposes to add a small text segment on the
> `MemorySegment::reinterpret` overloads that takes an Arena stating the
> responsibility of actually freeing reinterpreted segments lies with the
> *original* arena.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemorySegment.java line 766:
> 764: * method returns a segment that behaves as if it had been allocated
> using the
> 765: * provided arena except, the returned segment's deallocation is
> still managed by the
> 766: * original arena.
I think the old sentence is just misleading here, IMO it should be completely
removed. Maybe replaced with something like: "Note that if this segment was
created by calling `Arena#allocate`, only closing the original arena will
deallocate this segment's backing memory region".
test/jdk/java/foreign/TestSegments.java line 400:
> 398: MemorySegment segment;
> 399: try (Arena arena = Arena.ofConfined()){
> 400: try (Arena otherArena= Arena.ofConfined()) {
Suggestion:
try (Arena otherArena = Arena.ofConfined()) {
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21761#discussion_r1820722453
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21761#discussion_r1820722823
