On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:34:30 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in 
> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the 
> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the 
> unused warnings and addressed all of them by commenting out the code as 
> appropriate. I am confident that in many cases this simplistic approach of 
> commenting out code does not fix the underlying issue, and the warning 
> actually found a bug that should be fixed. In these instances, I will be 
> aiming to fix these bugs with help from reviewers, so I recommend anyone 
> reviewing who knows more about the code than I do to see whether there is 
> indeed a bug that needs fixing in a different way than what I did. This will 
> require reviews from core-libs, awt, security, accessibility, jpackage, and 
> whatever team is responsible for HotSpot debugging.
> 
> This fix requires C++17, so it will have to wait for the switch to C++17. I 
> will be working towards that in the meantime and addressing the issues that 
> come with changing the language standard elsewhere. This will only go in once 
> the JDK actually starts using C++17

src/java.desktop/share/native/common/awt/debug/debug_trace.h line 66:

> 64: /* each file includes this flag indicating module trace status */
> 65: #ifdef __cplusplus
> 66: [[maybe_unused]]

I don't particularly like this one, but I haven't managed to find a cleaner 
solution. This is because a static global in a header is not great to begin 
with. It's practically begging for an unused-variable error to happen

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21616#discussion_r1808952439

Reply via email to