On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:17:12 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/classfile/classFileParser.cpp line 4098: >> >>> 4096: } >>> 4097: } >>> 4098: >> >> This code should not be removed. The spec for this code should now be: >> >> // If the loader is not the boot loader then throw an exception if its >> // superclass is in package jdk.internal.reflect >> >> All we need do is remove the check: >> >> && !java_lang_ClassLoader::is_reflection_class_loader > > Oh that's a good find. Maybe we should write a test for this, if as I assume > there isn't one already. > Edit: not with this RFE, just in general. > // If the loader is not the boot loader then throw an exception if its > // superclass is in package jdk.internal.reflect This will never happen. `jdk.internal.reflect` is a non-exported package in `java.base` module. If another module `M` defines a class whose superclass is in `jdk.internal.reflect` package, `java.base` must export `jdk.internal.reflect` package to `M` for access. Otherwise, it will fail the super access check, as done in the check below this deleted code. Reflection::VerifyClassAccessResults vca_result = Reflection::verify_class_access(this_klass, InstanceKlass::cast(super), false); ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21571#discussion_r1806781954