On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 17:48:13 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulie...@openjdk.org>
wrote:
>> @rgiulietti Which means, however, wanting to work with a precision of
>> billions of decimal digits, and therefore taking on the consequences...
>
> It takes around 100 ms and less than 1 MB to build a table up to 20 rather
> than 29.
> It can be fully constructed in `static { ... }`, avoiding races.
>
> IMO, this would cover the vast majority of the cases encountered in practice.
> Other, way less common usages with multi-millions or billions of digits would
> then impact running time but not _persistent_ memory footprint.
>
> WDYT?
@rgiulietti It can be a good compromise between memory and running time...
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21323#discussion_r1788087580
