On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:10:24 GMT, Jatin Bhateja <jbhat...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi All,
>> 
>> As per the discussion on panama-dev mailing list[1], patch adds the support 
>> for following new two vector permutation APIs.
>> 
>> 
>> Declaration:-
>>     Vector<E>.selectFrom(Vector<E> v1, Vector<E> v2)
>> 
>> 
>> Semantics:-
>>     Using index values stored in the lanes of "this" vector, assemble the 
>> values stored in first (v1) and second (v2) vector arguments. Thus, first 
>> and second vector serves as a table, whose elements are selected based on 
>> index value vector. API is applicable to all integral and floating-point 
>> types.  The result of this operation is semantically equivalent to 
>> expression v1.rearrange(this.toShuffle(), v2). Values held in index vector 
>> lanes must lie within valid two vector index range [0, 2*VLEN) else an 
>> IndexOutOfBoundException is thrown.  
>> 
>> Summary of changes:
>> -  Java side implementation of new selectFrom API.
>> -  C2 compiler IR and inline expander changes.
>> -  In absence of direct two vector permutation instruction in target ISA, a 
>> lowering transformation dismantles new IR into constituent IR supported by 
>> target platforms. 
>> -  Optimized x86 backend implementation for AVX512 and legacy target.
>> -  Function tests covering new API.
>> 
>> JMH micro included with this patch shows around 10-15x gain over existing 
>> rearrange API :-
>> Test System: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480+ [ Sapphire Rapids Server]
>> 
>> 
>>   Benchmark                                     (size)   Mode  Cnt      
>> Score   Error   Units
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromByteVector     1024  thrpt    2   2041.762  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromByteVector     2048  thrpt    2   1028.550  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromIntVector      1024  thrpt    2    962.605  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromIntVector      2048  thrpt    2    479.004  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromLongVector     1024  thrpt    2    359.758  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromLongVector     2048  thrpt    2    178.192  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromShortVector    1024  thrpt    2   1463.459  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.rearrangeFromShortVector    2048  thrpt    2    727.556  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.selectFromByteVector        1024  thrpt    2  33254.830  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.selectFromByteVector        2048  thrpt    2  17313.174  
>>         ops/ms
>> SelectFromBenchmark.selectFromIntVector         1024  thrpt    2  10756.804  
>>         ops/ms
>> S...
>
> Jatin Bhateja has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Handling NPOT vector length for AArch64 SVE with vector sizes varying b/w 
> 128 and 2048 bits at 128 bit increments.

src/hotspot/share/opto/vectorIntrinsics.cpp line 2698:

> 2696:   int cast_vopc = VectorCastNode::opcode(-1, elem_bt, true);
> 2697:   if (is_floating_point_type(elem_bt)) {
> 2698:     index_elem_bt = elem_bt == T_FLOAT ? T_INT : T_LONG;

index_elem_bt is already assigned at line 2676 and 2678 so this line could be 
removed.

src/jdk.incubator.vector/share/classes/jdk/incubator/vector/ByteVector.java 
line 551:

> 549:         return ((ByteVector)src1).vectorFactory(res);
> 550:     }
> 551: 

This could instead be:
   src1.rearrange(this.lanewise(VectorOperators.AND, 2 * VLENGTH - 
1).toShuffle(), src2);
Or even simplified to:
   src1.rearrange(this.toShuffle(), src2);

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20508#discussion_r1777839817
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20508#discussion_r1779722306

Reply via email to