On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:34:49 GMT, Vladimir Kozelkov <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > I don't think anything else is needed here. > > Besides the fact that it shouldn't run, but it does (all 4 examples run > without any exception!) I meant - no other layout is needed - as we don't have any "alignment gap" here - the union size is already a multiple of its alignment. So, this seems another case where there's "redundant" padding that is not detected. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21041#issuecomment-2383605851
