On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:40:21 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review the following PR which addresses that ZipOutputStream should 
> validate the CEN header fields similar to what was done via 
> [JDK-8316141](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316141)
> 
> As part of this change, the javadoc for ZipEntry has been updated to indicate 
> that the CEN Header(46 bytes) + entry name length + comment length + extra 
> data length must not exceed 0xfffff.
> 
> Mach5 tiers 1-3 runs were clean.  The zip and jar JCK tests also continue to 
> pass

src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/ZipEntry.java line 42:

> 40:  * <P>
> 41:  * The combined length of the entry name, the extra field data, the
> 42:  * entry comment and {@link ZipFile#CENHDR CEN Header size}, must not

I think you flipped the usage of `@link` and `@linkplain` in this spec 
addition. `@link` renders code with hyperlink, and `@linkplain` renders like 
regular body font with hyperlink.

And the constant is available in this class too, so no need to link to 
`ZipFile` really.
Suggestion:

 * entry comment and {@linkplain #CENHDR CEN Header size}, must not

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21003#discussion_r1759452318

Reply via email to