On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:23:40 GMT, fabioromano1 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This implementation of MutableBigInteger.leftShift(int) optimizes the 
>> current version, avoiding unnecessary copy of the MutableBigInteger's value 
>> content and performing the primitive shifting only in the original portion 
>> of the value array rather than in the value yet extended with trailing zeros.
>
> fabioromano1 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revision tests changes

test/jdk/java/math/BigInteger/MutableBigIntegerShiftTests.java line 26:

> 24: import jdk.test.lib.RandomFactory;
> 25: import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
> 26: import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.FieldSource;

Unfortunately, the version of JUnit included in the jtreg test harness does not 
yet have `FieldSource` :-(
Here and below are my suggestions for an alternative.
Suggestion:

import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.MethodSource;

test/jdk/java/math/BigInteger/MutableBigIntegerShiftTests.java line 50:

> 48:     static final int ORDER_SMALL = 60;
> 49:     static final int ORDER_MEDIUM = 100;
> 50:     static final int[] ORDERS = { ORDER_SMALL, ORDER_MEDIUM };

Suggestion:


    private static int[] orders() {
        return new int[] { ORDER_SMALL, ORDER_MEDIUM };
    }

test/jdk/java/math/BigInteger/MutableBigIntegerShiftTests.java line 55:

> 53: 
> 54:     @ParameterizedTest
> 55:     @FieldSource("ORDERS")

Suggestion:

    @MethodSource("orders")

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20008#discussion_r1754980042
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20008#discussion_r1754980612
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20008#discussion_r1754980828

Reply via email to