On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:45:30 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this enhancement which proposes to enhance > `java.util.zip.Deflater/Inflater` classes to now implement `AutoCloseable`? > > The actual work for this was done a few years back when we discussed the > proposed approaches and then I raised a RFR. At that time I couldn't take > this to completion. The current changes in this PR involve the implementation > that was discussed at that time and also have implemented the review > suggestions from that time. Here are those previous discussions and reviews: > > https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2019-June/061079.html > https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2019-July/061177.html > https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2019-July/061229.html > > To summarize those discussions, we had concluded that: > - `Deflater` and `Inflater` will implement the `AutoCloseable` interface > - In the `close()` implementation we will invoke the `end()` method (`end()` > can be potentially overridden by subclasses). > - `close()` will be specified and implemented to be idempotent. Calling > `close()` a second time or more will be a no-op. > - Calling `end()` and then `close()`, although uncommon, will also support > idempotency and that `close()` call will be a no-op. > - However, calling `close()` and then `end()` will not guarantee idempotency > and depending on the implementing subclass, the `end()` may throw an > exception. > > New tests have been included as part of these changes and they continue to > pass along with existing tests in tier1, tier2 and tier3. When I had > originally added these new tests, I hadn't used junit. I can convert them to > junit if that's preferable. > > I'll file a CSR shortly. This pull request has been closed without being integrated. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19675
