On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:32:15 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I feel like making it ACC_INTERFACE might cause some error if there are no 
>> public nonstatic methods, which is the case with this class. I don't know 
>> what @liach your comment means, but this code got more complicated than it 
>> was with the first version of this change.  When I talked to @rose00 he 
>> thought ACC_ABSTRACT would be okay for this.
>
> Yes, you are right that we currently don't add ACC_PUBLIC flags on methods, 
> which will fail if we add ACC_INTERFACE. Same for the fields; these 
> LambdaForm classes use fields to store class data that's usually stored as 
> condy, because LambdaForm is the infrastructure that condy uses (like 
> LambdaMetafacotry cannot use lambdas). Those fields are my concerns for the 
> interface migration.

Thanks for reviewing this part.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19157#discussion_r1735039561

Reply via email to