On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:12:44 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This PR refactors type matching in BootstrapMethodInvoker and adds a few 
> types, seeking to improve bootstrap overheads of some ConstantBootstraps and 
> in particular the ProxyGenerator condys generated for e.g. annotation proxies 
> since [JDK-8332457](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332457)
> 
> I've adjusted the micro-benchmark added by JDK-8332457 to not only generate a 
> proxy but also call into one of the proxied methodt (`Object::hashCode`). 
> 
> Running org.openjdk.bench.java.lang.reflect.ProxyGenBench as a one-off 
> startup benchmark sees significant improvement (-9% instructions, -6% cycles):
> 
> Name             Cnt           Base          Error            Test          
> Error         Unit  Change
> Perfstartup-JMH   20        154,000 ±        8,165         148,000 ±       
> 23,164        ms/op   1,04x (p = 0,352 )
>   :.cycles            925335973,200 ± 47147600,262   842221278,800 ± 
> 46836254,964       cycles   0,91x (p = 0,000*)
>   :.instructions     2101588857,600 ± 81105850,361  1966307798,400 ± 
> 22011043,908 instructions   0,94x (p = 0,000*)
>   :.taskclock               291,500 ±       16,494         262,000 ±       
> 15,328           ms   0,90x (p = 0,000*)
>   * = significant
> 
> Number of classes loaded drops from 1096 to 1092
> 
> Running the micro regularly shows no significant difference:
> 
> Name                              Cnt   Base   Error    Test   Error  Unit  
> Change
> ProxyGenBench.generateAndProxy100  10 26,827 ± 8,954  26,855 ± 7,531 ms/op   
> 1,00x (p = 0,991 )
>   * = significant

As an aside: I suppose we pre-generate all the linkers that get spun up for 
these `invokeExact`calls already. But, we might still get a little bit of 
mileage out of switching to `invokeBasic`, which bypasses the linkers 
altogether. With the caveat that we have to be very careful that the call site 
type is correct.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19598#issuecomment-2154881850

Reply via email to