On Wed, 15 May 2024 18:49:49 GMT, ExE Boss <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/lang/stable/StableValueImpl.java >> line 240: >> >>> 238: } >>> 239: } finally { >>> 240: supplying = false; >> >> Resetting a stable field is a bad idea. I recommend renaming this to >> `supplierCalled` or `supplied` so we never transition this false -> true > > Yes, according to the `@Stable` annotation’s JavaDoc, this is UB: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8a4315f833f3700075d65fae6bc566011c837c07/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/Stable.java#L74-L80
Fyi what usually happens is that if a stable field or similarly constant-folded field is promoted to constant, the constant promotion can happen to any of the previous valid values written. MethodHandle optimisitically sets a trusted final field this way: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8a4315f833f3700075d65fae6bc566011c837c07/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java#L1868-L1870 Also a similar example in user code targeting older Java releases, before JDK 16's strong encapsulation so that enums could have been added by reflection: https://github.com/MinecraftForge/MinecraftForge/issues/3885#issuecomment-355602542 ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18794#discussion_r1602125255