On Fri, 3 May 2024 21:59:40 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Ideally, we should have separate tests that make sure that jdk.internal.le >>> is the default impl. >> >> We have a test that checks if `System.console()` returns the correct Console >> (or null) from the expected module >> (`test/jdk/java/io/Console/ModuleSelectionTest.java`) >> >>> We should also test this behaviour (i.e. % interpretation) on >>> jdk.internal.io Console impl. >> >> Yeah, that would be helpful. > >> We have a test that checks if `System.console()` returns the correct Console >> (or null) from the expected module >> (`test/jdk/java/io/Console/ModuleSelectionTest.java`) >> > > Good; then here we should indeed specify `-Djdk.console=jdk.internal.le`. > Initially, I suggested an alternative wording (i.e. "default"), but that's > inappropriate. After all, the test in question resides in > `test/jdk/jdk/internal/jline`. So it only makes sense that it tests that > concrete implementation. > >> Yeah, that would be helpful. >> > > I filed a bug: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331681 Thanks. I've added `-Djdk.console=jdk.internal.le`, and also added a test for the `java.base`'s console: `test/jdk/java/io/Console/ConsolePromptTest.java`. I can easily remove the latter if this is not a reasonable form. Or I can fix it as needed. Please let me know. Thanks. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19081#discussion_r1591228737