> Hi,
> During performance optimization work on Class-File API as JDK lambda 
> generator we found some static initialization killers.
> One of them is `java.lang.classfile.Attributes` with tens of static fields 
> initialized with individual attribute mappers, and common set of all mappers, 
> and static map from attribute names to the mappers.
> 
> I propose to turn all the static fields into lazy-initialized static methods 
> and remove `PREDEFINED_ATTRIBUTES` and `standardAttribute(Utf8Entry name)` 
> static mapping method from the `Attributes` API class.
>  
> Please let me know your comments or objections and please review the 
> [PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/19006) and 
> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331414), so we can make it into 23.
> 
> Thank you,
> Adam

Adam Sotona has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since 
the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8331291-attributes
 - changed order in allowed modules attributes check
 - added bug number
 - added impl comment
 - removed list of predefined attributes
   standard attributes mapping hard-coded and moved to BoundAttribute
   added AttributesTest::testAttributesMapping
 - move mappers implementations to AbstractAttributeMapper
 - 8331291: java.lang.classfile.Attributes class performs a lot of static 
initializations

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19006/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19006/files/f0d9174e..fd8da774

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19006&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19006&range=02-03

  Stats: 4061 lines in 236 files changed: 1910 ins; 657 del; 1494 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19006.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19006/head:pull/19006

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19006

Reply via email to