On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:07:37 GMT, Justin Lu <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this PR and associated 
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8327703) which introduces strict 
>> parsing for NumberFormat.
>> 
>> The concrete subclasses that will utilize this leniency value are 
>> `DecimalFormat` and `CompactNumberFormat`. Strict leniency allows for 
>> parsing to be used as an input validation technique for localized formatted 
>> numbers. The default leniency mode will remain lenient, and can only be set 
>> to strict through an intentional `setLenient(boolean)` method call. Leniency 
>> operates differently based off the values returned by `isGroupingUsed()`, 
>> `getGroupingSize()`, and `isParseIntegerOnly()`.
>> 
>> Below is an example of the change, the CSR can be viewed for further detail.
>> 
>> 
>> DecimalFormat fmt = (DecimalFormat) 
>> NumberFormat.getNumberInstance(Locale.US);
>> fmt.parse("1,,,0,,,00,.23Zabced45");  // returns 1000.23
>> fmt.setLenient(false);
>> fmt.parse("1,,,0,,,00,.23Zabced45"); // Now throws a ParseException
>> fmt.setGroupingSize(2);
>> fmt.parse("12,34,567"); // throws ParseException
>> fmt.setParseIntegerOnly(true)
>> fmt.parse("12,34.56"); // throws ParseException
>> fmt.parse("12,34"); // successfully returns the Number 1234
>> 
>> 
>> The associated tests are all localized, and the data is converted properly 
>> during runtime.
>
> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Replace protected field with a public getter -> isStrict().
>   Replace setLenient() with setStrict() to avoid messy inversion of boolean.
>   Add a leniency section to NumberFormat.
>   Overhaul of NumberFormat class specification to be much more 
> organized/readable.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/text/DecimalFormat.java line 2419:

> 2417:             if (gotPositive) {
> 2418:                 boolean containsPosSuffix =
> 2419:                         text.regionMatches(position, positiveSuffix,0, 
> positiveSuffix.length());

Suggestion:

                        text.regionMatches(position, positiveSuffix, 0, 
positiveSuffix.length());

src/java.base/share/classes/java/text/DecimalFormat.java line 2426:

> 2424:             if (gotNegative) {
> 2425:                 boolean containsNegSuffix =
> 2426:                         text.regionMatches(position, negativeSuffix,0, 
> negativeSuffix.length());

Suggestion:

                        text.regionMatches(position, negativeSuffix, 0, 
negativeSuffix.length());

src/java.base/share/classes/java/text/DecimalFormat.java line 2428:

> 2426:                         text.regionMatches(position, negativeSuffix,0, 
> negativeSuffix.length());
> 2427:                 boolean endsWithNegSuffix =
> 2428:                         containsNegSuffix && text.length() == position  
> + negativeSuffix.length();

Suggestion:

                        containsNegSuffix && text.length() == position + 
negativeSuffix.length();

src/java.base/share/classes/java/text/DecimalFormat.java line 2482:

> 2480:         // process digits or Inf, find decimal position
> 2481:         status[STATUS_INFINITE] = false;
> 2482:         if (!isExponent && text.regionMatches(position, 
> symbols.getInfinity(),0,

Suggestion:

        if (!isExponent && text.regionMatches(position, symbols.getInfinity(), 
0,

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18339#discussion_r1529965478
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18339#discussion_r1529965780
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18339#discussion_r1529966184
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18339#discussion_r1529966645

Reply via email to