On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:28:47 GMT, Justin Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> The "can be used to create" seems conditional.
>>
>> It is conditional - in the sense that you don't _have_ to use it to create a
>> new instance of `MessageFormat`. You can also use it for something else, in
>> other words.
>>
>> But I also understand how it comes across as a bit wishy-washy...
>>
>> Hmm, what do you think about this wording?
>>
>>
>> @implSpec The implementation in {@link MessageFormat} returns a string that,
>> when passed to the {@link MessageFormat(String)} constructor, produces an
>> instance that is semantically equivalent to this instance.
>
> Not sure which wording will ultimately be used, but if the wording ends up
> including the constructor, it's probably worth mentioning the `applyPattern`
> method as well.
Good point... maybe this?
@implSpec The implementation in {@link MessageFormat} returns a string that,
when passed
to a {@code MessageFormat()} constructor or {@link #applyPattern
applyPattern()}, produces
an instance that is semantically equivalent to this instance.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17416#discussion_r1468170808
