On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 23:06:32 GMT, Scott Gibbons <sgibb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only >> using AVX2 instructions. This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average >> 1.3x for AVX2. The benchmark numbers: >> >> >> Benchmark Score >> Latest >> StringIndexOf.advancedWithMediumSub 343.573 317.934 >> 0.925375393x >> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub1 1039.081 1053.96 >> 1.014319384x >> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub2 55.828 110.541 >> 1.980027943x >> StringIndexOf.constantPattern 9.361 11.906 >> 1.271872663x >> StringIndexOf.searchCharLongSuccess 4.216 4.218 >> 1.000474383x >> StringIndexOf.searchCharMediumSuccess 3.133 3.216 >> 1.02649218x >> StringIndexOf.searchCharShortSuccess 3.76 3.761 >> 1.000265957x >> StringIndexOf.success 9.186 >> 9.713 1.057369911x >> StringIndexOf.successBig 14.341 46.343 >> 3.231504079x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_String 6220.918 12154.52 >> 1.953814533x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_char 5503.556 5540.044 >> 1.006629895x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_String 6978.854 6818.689 >> 0.977049957x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_char 5657.499 5474.624 >> 0.967675646x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_String 7132.541 >> 6863.359 0.962260014x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_char 16013.389 16162.437 >> 1.009307711x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_String 7386.123 14771.622 >> 1.999915517x >> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_char 9901.671 9782.245 >> 0.987938803 > > Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 22 commits: > > - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into indexof > - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into indexof > - Addressing review comments. > - Fix for JDK-8321599 > - Support UU IndexOf > - Only use optimization when EnableX86ECoreOpts is true > - Fix whitespace > - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into indexof > - Comments; added exhaustive-ish test > - Subtracting 0x10 twice. > - ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8e12053e...3e58d0c2 src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1528: > 1526: #endif > 1527: > 1528: __ subptr(rsp, 0xf0); Can we spill them into XXMs, to save costly stack operations. src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1544: > 1542: // if (k == 0) { > 1543: // return 0; > 1544: // } Kindly use meaningful variable and label names. It will ease the review process and maintenance. src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1545: > 1543: // return 0; > 1544: // } > 1545: __ movq(r12, rcx); Check for K == 0 should use rsi. src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1551: > 1549: __ movq(r15, rsi); > 1550: __ movq(r11, rdi); > 1551: __ cmpq(rsi, 0x20); All comparisons are with 32 bit int value , cmpq -> cmpl, may save emitting REX encoding prefix (no need for setting REX.W). src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1552: > 1550: __ movq(r11, rdi); > 1551: __ cmpq(rsi, 0x20); > 1552: __ jb(L_small_string); All the comparisons against needled / haystack lengths are signed integer comparisons, so jb should be replaced by jl ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1453226797 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1453227987 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1453245805 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1453250207 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1453294109
