On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:52:03 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Tried not to introduce new `*_all` groups here. `jdk_all` would be the same >> as `jdk:all`, TBH. But we still can do it for symmetry reasons, see new >> commit. > > "all" looks okay but the comment "Catch-all" suggests something else, > shouldn't be "All tests"? Yeah, we can do "All tests" instead. See new commit. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17422#discussion_r1453113607
