> Discovered while writing a test for #16513 that > `ClassSignature.superclassSignature()` does not return a `ClassTypeSig`, yet > [JVM > Spec](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se21/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.7.9.1-4100) > requires it to be one. This patch adds such a requirement to the accessors, > factories, and the parsing logic.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits: - Fix a few other invalid signatures - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into feature/class-signature-elements - Add extra test cases for new bad class signatures - Merge branch 'master' into feature/class-signature-elements - Merge branch 'master' into feature/class-signature-elements - 8319463: ClassSignature should have superclass and superinterfaces as ClassTypeSig ------------- Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=16514&range=02 Stats: 201 lines in 6 files changed: 120 ins; 30 del; 51 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16514/head:pull/16514 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514
