On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:43:22 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> As recently discussed on core libs, sealed-ness information could be included > in the Class.toGenericString() output, analagous to how "modifiers" that also > correspond to JVM access flags are handled. > > This is the initial spec, implementation, and test updated needed for that > change. If there is consensus this is a reasonable direction, I'll create the > CSR, etc. As the output of toGenericString does not attempt to fully capture the full declaration information of a class or interfaces, omitted any extends or implementation information for example, I think it is fine to also omit any listed of permitted subtypes for a sealed class or interface. This sidesteps design issues around which permitted subtypes should be filtered out for display purposes, etc. CSR up for review: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322969 TIA ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17239#issuecomment-1875783748 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17239#issuecomment-1875794166
