On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 00:52:36 GMT, Shaojin Wen <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> j.u.Formatter now prints "%tF" (iso standard date) and the result is >> incorrect when processing year < 0 or year > 9999 > > Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Use minus sign from cached DecimalFormatSymbols and improved testcase Looks like your fix causes a regression test failure in test/jdk/java/time/test/java/util/TestFormatter.java ----------System.out:(1097/72894)---------- test test.java.util.TestFormatter.test("en_US"): success test test.java.util.TestFormatter.test("th_TH"): success ChronoZonedDateTimeImpl(Japanese) actual: D:[04/19/05] F:[2023-04-19] FAILED; expected: D:[04/19/05] F:[0005-04-19] java.lang.RuntimeException at test.java.util.TestFormatter.test(TestFormatter.java:198) at test.java.util.TestFormatter.testDate(TestFormatter.java:216) at test.java.util.TestFormatter.test(TestFormatter.java:114) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:132) at org.testng.internal.TestInvoker.invokeMethod(TestInvoker.java:599) at org.testng.internal.TestInvoker.invokeTestMethod(TestInvoker.java:174) at org.testng.internal.MethodRunner.runInSequence(MethodRunner.java:46) at org.testng.internal.TestInvoker$MethodInvocationAgent.invoke(TestInvoker.java:822) at org.testng.internal.TestInvoker.invokeTestMethods(TestInvoker.java:147) at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:146) at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:128) at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1597) at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:764) at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:585) at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:384) at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:378) at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:337) at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:286) at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:53) at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:96) at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1218) at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1140) at org.testng.TestNG.runSuites(TestNG.java:1069) at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1037) at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.TestNGRunner.main(TestNGRunner.java:102) at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.TestNGRunner.main(TestNGRunner.java:58) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainTask.run(MainWrapper.java:138) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1570) Please make sure all the related regression tests pass. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16033#issuecomment-1804237006