I think I’m missing something. Why wouldn’t you just; import java.lang.StringTemplate.Processor;
Processor<URL, RuntimeException> urlEncode = template -> URLEncoder.encode(template.interpolate(), UTF_8)); Processor<String, RuntimeException> CSV = template -> StringEscapeUtils.escapeCsv<https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/apidocs/src-html/org/apache/commons/lang3/StringEscapeUtils.html#line.768>(template.interpolate()); On Oct 26, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Rob Spoor <open...@icemanx.nl> wrote: I've been reading up on string templates, and I think it's a very cool feature. However, writing a custom processor can be a lot of copy-paste work if you want STR but with some extra translation applied. For instance, if I'd want to have a URL encoding processor I would have to write everything from scratch. I think it would be useful to overload interpolate (both static and non-static) with a custom Function<Object, String> as additional arguments. This would work like STR if that provided String::valueOf as function. With this method, creating a URL encoding processor would be as simple as this: var urlEncode = template -> template.interpolate(o -> URLEncoder.encode(String.valueOf(o), UTF_8)); var url = urlEncode."https://host/path/\{id}?param=\{value\}"; Likewise, a processor backed by Apache Commons Text's StringEscapeUtils would now be just as simple: var CSV = template -> template.interpolate(o -> StringEscapeUtils.ESCAPE_CSV.translate(String.valueOf(o)); var csv = CSV.""" Header1, Header2, Header3 "\{value1}", "\{value2}", "\{value3}" """; If the JVM allows it, the existing interpolate method can even delegate to the new overload providing String::valueOf.