Hi Alan, Thanks for your response and the suggestion. I have copied, net-dev on my original mail. I will wait for a response from net-dev group.
Regards, Ramdas ________________________________ From: Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 8:51 PM To: Nandagiri, Ramadasu (NSDi) <ramadasu.nandag...@hpe.com>; net-...@openjdk.org <net-...@openjdk.org>; core-libs-dev@openjdk.org <core-libs-dev@openjdk.org> Cc: Bhat, Suma Mudakare Bheema (NSDi) <suma.mud.b...@hpe.com>; Gragg, Jeffrey <jeff.gr...@hpe.com> Subject: Re: Request for JCK17 tests exclusion On 18/10/2023 15:55, Nandagiri, Ramadasu (NSDi) wrote: Hi, Please see the discussion in the following mails. One of the TCK test cases, api/java_net/MulticastSocket/ClassLevel.html is failing on NonStop platform as NonStop doesn't support IP_MULTICAST_ALL option. We would like this test case to be excluded from TCK. Please share your thoughts on this request. I realize you have been directed here but this is not the right place to discuss TCK exclusion requests. >From the mails you forwarded then it looks like there are issues with the >multicast support in your port to NonStop. The IP_MULTICAST_ALL socket option >you mention is used in the Linux port to avoid interference when two sockets >are bound to the same port but joined to different multicast groups. Linux is >an outlier in this scenario so the socket option is set to prevent the >interference. My guess is that few people here will know NonStop but you could >being porting questions on this code to net-dev. -Alan
