On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:02:52 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We run into some BackingStoreException: Couldn't get file lock. e.g. here : >> >> [JShell] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: >> java.util.prefs.BackingStoreException: Couldn't get file lock. >> [JShell] at >> jdk.jshell/jdk.internal.jshell.tool.JShellToolBuilder$PreferencesStorage.flush(JShellToolBuilder.java:313) >> [JShell] at >> jdk.jshell/jdk.internal.jshell.tool.JShellTool$ReplayableHistory.storeHistory(JShellTool.java:692) >> [JShell] at >> jdk.jshell/jdk.internal.jshell.tool.JShellTool.start(JShellTool.java:1008) >> [JShell] at >> jdk.jshell/jdk.internal.jshell.tool.JShellToolBuilder.start(JShellToolBuilder.java:261) >> [JShell] at >> jdk.jshell/jdk.internal.jshell.tool.JShellToolProvider.main(JShellToolProvider.java:120) >> [JShell] Caused by: java.util.prefs.BackingStoreException: Couldn't get file >> lock. >> [JShell] at >> java.prefs/java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences.sync(FileSystemPreferences.java:769) >> [JShell] at >> java.prefs/java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences.flush(FileSystemPreferences.java:864) >> [JShell] at >> jdk.jshell/jdk.internal.jshell.tool.JShellToolBuilder$PreferencesStorage.flush(JShellToolBuilder.java:311) >> [JShell] ... 4 more >> >> The BackingStoreException should be enhanced e.g. by adding the >> errno/errorCode that is already available in the coding > > src/java.prefs/unix/classes/java/util/prefs/FileSystemPreferences.java line > 773: > >> 771: String sharingMode = "shared"; >> 772: if (!shared) sharingMode = "nonshared"; >> 773: throw(new BackingStoreException("Couldn't get file lock. >> errno is " + errCode + " mode is " + sharingMode)); > > A raw errno is pretty uninformative, except for experts. Can the errno be > translated to a string as well as supplying the errno? Hi Roger, sounds like a good idea to translate it to a more informative string. Do you have an utility function in mind that does this ? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15308#discussion_r1296822489