On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:34:33 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > it's likely to introduce non-trivial additional overhead > > What do you mean? E.g. where would the overhead come from? You suggested changes stored the ByteBuffer into a field. I measured throughput with JMH, and it shows that using ByteBuffer like this results in over 50% drop in throughput. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14636#discussion_r1269653896
