On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:08:27 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov <stsypa...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Looks ok; was this a tool detected race? > > @RogerRiggs no tool, just fell into the sources while debugging my application @stsypanov I don't see that there's any issue with the existing code as the volatile field is only written at most once as guarded by the synchronized-block. Best case this patch avoids an extra volatile read (presuming it isn't optimized away). ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14692#issuecomment-1613070489
