On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:30:43 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think a message like 'Class.field' is better, more consistent with > methodToString's behavior. Hi, @liach, thanks for your suggestions, this `Class.field` format is indeed more succinct. But I'm following this format (`NoSuchFieldError` thrown in `linkResolver.cpp`). https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/d1d2b55ce0b950e07f6e3761983f73fd58079627/src/hotspot/share/interpreter/linkResolver.cpp#L976-L984 Anyway, the point here is that the name of the class should be added to the message. So maybe both are acceptable. Let's wait for some others' opinions :D ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14624#issuecomment-1604104282
