On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 01:08:51 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Should we consolidate this distinct class loader note into 
>> `descriptorString` too?
>
> This method was added prior to `MethodTypeDesc`.    
> MethodTypeDesc::ofDescriptor` and `MethodTypeDesc::resolveConstantDesc` would 
> be the alternative way to get back the method type.  I tend to think that 
> `descriptorString` would not need that distinct class loader note (as it 
> would use the Lookup class to resolve instead).

Since the method type descriptor info is available in `descriptorString` but 
it's a reason `toMethodDescriptorString` is not a strict inverse of 
`fromMethodDescriptorString`, I propose to reword the notes sections to the 
following:

     * @apiNote
     * This is not a strict inverse of {@link #fromMethodDescriptorString
     * fromMethodDescriptorString} which requires a method type descriptor
     * (JVMS {@jvms 4.3.3}) and a suitable class loader argument. Two distinct
     * classes which share a common name but have different class loaders will
     * appear identical when viewed within descriptor strings.
     * <p>
     * This method is included for the benefit of applications that must
     * generate bytecodes that process method handles and {@code invokedynamic}.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14411#discussion_r1228866290

Reply via email to