On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 01:08:51 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Should we consolidate this distinct class loader note into >> `descriptorString` too? > > This method was added prior to `MethodTypeDesc`. > MethodTypeDesc::ofDescriptor` and `MethodTypeDesc::resolveConstantDesc` would > be the alternative way to get back the method type. I tend to think that > `descriptorString` would not need that distinct class loader note (as it > would use the Lookup class to resolve instead). Since the method type descriptor info is available in `descriptorString` but it's a reason `toMethodDescriptorString` is not a strict inverse of `fromMethodDescriptorString`, I propose to reword the notes sections to the following: * @apiNote * This is not a strict inverse of {@link #fromMethodDescriptorString * fromMethodDescriptorString} which requires a method type descriptor * (JVMS {@jvms 4.3.3}) and a suitable class loader argument. Two distinct * classes which share a common name but have different class loaders will * appear identical when viewed within descriptor strings. * <p> * This method is included for the benefit of applications that must * generate bytecodes that process method handles and {@code invokedynamic}. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14411#discussion_r1228866290