On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 16:42:21 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> I wouldn't normally suggest dropping an import and using a qualified class 
> name but "Handler" is a very generic class name, replacing it with "new 
> sun.net.www.protocol.jar.Handler()" might be clearer.

I agree. I have now updated the PR to use the fully qualified name at the call 
site and also adjusted the code comment as recommended.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14395#discussion_r1224950954

Reply via email to