> Normally when a virtual thread wrapper is used to run a test, the main thread 
> is renamed to "old-m-a-i-n" and the new virtual thread that will act as the 
> main thread is named "main". Neither is being done by `ProcessTools.main()`. 
> This can cause problems for tests that expect the main thread that the test 
> is running in to be called "main". It is instead left unnamed. This is 
> causing the following 4 tests to fail:
> 
> com/sun/jdi/JdbMethodExitTest.java
> com/sun/jdi/JdbStepTest.java
> com/sun/jdi/JdbStopThreadTest.java
> com/sun/jdi/JdbStopThreadidTest.java
> 
> These tests also fail due to 
> [JDK-8309397](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309397), which will be 
> fixed after this CR, and also com/sun/jdi/JdbMethodExitTest.java fails due to 
> [JDK-8309396](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309396), which will also 
> subsequently be fixed.
> 
> Note this fix messed up one runtime test. It was expecting an exception 
> message to mention the "main" thread rather than "old-m-a-i-n". Loosening the 
> exception message matching pattern a bit solved the problem.
> 
> Testing was done by running all of tier1 and tier5.

Chris Plummer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional 
commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'master' into 8309334_processtools
   merge
 - when using virtual threads, properly name the main threads

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14292/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14292/files/e53abaf4..de5ca147

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14292&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14292&range=00-01

  Stats: 4052 lines in 65 files changed: 3213 ins; 625 del; 214 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14292.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14292/head:pull/14292

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14292

Reply via email to