On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:07:42 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yeah - I meant what you said - but now that you said it, I also saw how what >> I've written can be prone to an alternate (and wrong) interpretation. I'll >> clarify. > > Actually, looking back at this I'm not sure it's correct? We have an input > memory segment MS. And a layout path. A layout path identifies an offset O at > which MS has to be accessed in order to read a value (of some type). I'm not > sure any of this depends on "base address" ? Hmm, that's true. The base address that we read and turn into a memory segment isn't necessarily accessed, but the MS we read the base address from is. So, on second thought, I think the current text is good as it is. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14098#discussion_r1214272188
