On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 13:18:27 GMT, Richard Reingruber <rr...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Martin Doerr has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Revert unintended formatting changes. Fix comment.
>
> src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/upcallLinker_ppc.cpp line 236:
> 
>> 234:   __ block_comment("{ receiver ");
>> 235:   __ load_const_optimized(R3_ARG1, (intptr_t)receiver, R0);
>> 236:   __ resolve_jobject(R3_ARG1, tmp, R31, 
>> MacroAssembler::PRESERVATION_FRAME_LR_GP_FP_REGS); // kills R31
> 
> As a simplification the receiver could be resolved in 
> `UpcallLinker::on_entry` and returned in `JavaThread::_vm_result`.

This sounds like a nice enhancement proposal for all platforms. The register 
spilling code in `resolve_jobject` can get lengthy dependent on the selected 
GC. Doing it in the C code (which we call anyway above) would make the upcall 
stubs smaller.
@JornVernee: What do you think about this idea?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12708#discussion_r1189763910

Reply via email to