On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:46:24 GMT, Adam Sotona <asot...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Constants API already provides models for all loadable constants to help
>> programs manipulating class files and modelling bytecode instructions.
>> However no models of module and package constants are provided by Constants
>> API. Every program manipulating class files must implement own models and
>> validation of modules and packages constants.
>>
>> This pul request adds `java.lang.constant.ModuleDesc` and
>> `java.lang.constant.PackageDesc` to the Constants API.
>>
>> Classfile API will follow up and remove its internal implementations of
>> `PackageDesc` and `ModuleDesc`.
>>
>> Please review this pull request and attached CSR.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Adam
>
> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> removed prefixes from name methods
Thanks for the update. Two typos. please do `make docs` to verify the output.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/constant/PackageDesc.java line 71:
> 69: * correct format
> 70: * @jvms 4.2.1 Binary Class and Interface Names
> 71: * @jvm 4.2.3 Module and Package Names
Suggestion:
* @jvms 4.2.3 Module and Package Names
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/constant/PackageDesc.java line 104:
> 102: * Compare the specified object with this descriptor for equality.
> 103: * Returns {@code true} if and only if the specified object is
> 104: * also a {@linkp PackageDesc} and both describe the same package.
Suggestion:
* also a {@link PackageDesc} and both describe the same package.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by mchung (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13615#pullrequestreview-1402503600
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13615#discussion_r1178204923
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13615#discussion_r1178205091
