On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 20:46:10 GMT, Steven R. Loomis <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Upgrading the CLDR to [version >> 43](https://cldr.unicode.org/index/downloads/cldr-43). This semi-annual >> release is their `limited-submission` release so I would not expect >> regressions caused by formatting changes as we had in JDK20/CLDRv42 >> (https://inside.java/2023/03/28/quality-heads-up/) > > make/data/cldr/common/main/ken.xml line 19: > >> 17: </localeDisplayNames> >> 18: <characters> >> 19: <exemplarCharacters>[a á à ǎ b c d e é è ě ɛ {ɛ\u0301} >> {ɛ\u0300} {ɛ\u030C} f g {gb} {gh} h i ɨ {ɨ\u0301} {ɨ\u0300} {ɨ\u030C} j k >> {kp} m n {ny} ŋ o ó ò ǒ ɔ {ɔ\u0301} {ɔ\u0300} {ɔ\u030C} p r s t u ú ù ǔ ʉ >> {ʉ\u0301} {ʉ\u0300} {ʉ\u030C} w y]</exemplarCharacters> > > @naotoj this is in common/main but not at basic level… is this intentional? JDK keeps CLDR sources intact. On building JDK, .xml files are transformed into ResourceBundles and those not at the basic level are filtered out. > make/data/cldr/common/properties/coverageLevels.txt line 115: > >> 113: sq ; modern ; Albanian >> 114: sr ; modern ; Serbian >> 115: sr_Latn ; modern ; Serbian (Latin) > > @naotoj BTW this was fixed Yes. The patch before was removed with this commit: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13469/commits/0e3456c8924960dc0bc488b08b9763bd08557a68 ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13469#discussion_r1166055276 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13469#discussion_r1166055288
