On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:24:54 GMT, ExE Boss <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> @link instead of @code > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectOutputStream.java line 588: > >> 586: * >> 587: * <p>Null can be returned as the object to be substituted, but may >> cause >> 588: * {@code NullPointerException} in classes that contain references >> to the > > Maybe use `{@link …}` instead of `{@code …}`? > Suggestion: > > * {@link NullPointerException} in classes that contain references to the
In this case I don't have a specific preference. I've updated the PR to use `@link` instead of `@code`. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13399#discussion_r1161109315