On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:24:54 GMT, ExE Boss <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   @link instead of @code
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectOutputStream.java line 588:
> 
>> 586:      *
>> 587:      * <p>Null can be returned as the object to be substituted, but may 
>> cause
>> 588:      * {@code NullPointerException} in classes that contain references 
>> to the
> 
> Maybe use `{@link …}` instead of `{@code …}`?
> Suggestion:
> 
>      * {@link NullPointerException} in classes that contain references to the

In this case I don't have a specific preference. I've updated the PR to use 
`@link` instead of `@code`.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13399#discussion_r1161109315

Reply via email to