On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:30:21 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > High level comment: these days we usually try to use junit 5 / jupiter > > instead of TestNG. > > I think my choice of testNG here might have been influenced by other ZIP area > tests using testNG. I guess a rewrite to junit should be pretty > straightforward. > > @LanceAndersen Do you have any opinion on junit/testNG for tests like this? We have had some discussion about using junit vs testNG but we have not mandated it so I am OK with either but certainly if you would like to move to junit as it should be fairly straight forward for this test, I think that would be nice ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12563#issuecomment-1488832703
