On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:36:40 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> @sadayapalam > > > Please include the following fix for the langtools test "failures": > > OK, applying these patches lets the tests pass. I can include them in this PR. > > The patch in TestJavacTaskScanner.java adjusts the expected number of > elements from 158 to 170, but I note that the error message in the test > failure is > > ``` > java.lang.Error: #parseTypeElements higher than expected; expected 158; > found: 180 > ``` > > The test still passes with the expected value of 170, as the criterion seems > to be that the actual number be within 10% of the expected number. Since the > actual number is 180, though, would it be better to use 180? Perhaps. The fudge factor seems to be implemented to prepare for a potential move downwards as well as upwards. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/7387#issuecomment-1308300571
