On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:24:47 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> The most important case is when there is no JVMTI env. If I read the changes > correctly, the overhead for park/continue changes from one volatile-read > (notifyJvmtiEvents) to two plain-writes (JavaThread::_is_in_VTMS_transition). > > If a JVMTI env has been created then there is no benefit for the moment as > there is still a call into the runtime to interact with > JvmtiVTMSTransitionDisabler. So I think you are saying that is for follow-on > PRs. @AlanBateman Yes, your conclusion is correct. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13054
