On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:23:59 GMT, Viktor Klang <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think the following proposal is very non-invasive and merely draws > attention to the fact that "witness value" is a specific term related to the > notion of these atomic methods. > > It's a small change which I think provides additional clarity, see JBS for > the discussion on the topic. Changes requested by dholmes (Reviewer). src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicReference.java line 357: > 355: * @param newValue the new value > 356: * @return the <em>witness value</em>, which is the current value > 357: * at the time of the operation. This change is not appropriate as discussed in JBS. And unclear why you changed only this version? Leftover? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12880
