On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:19:06 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I 
>> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port: 
>> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo.
>> 
>> A repo with the changes for JDK-8302027 and this PR successful build on the 
>> default set of platform and successfully run tier 1 tests, which includes 
>> tests of the math library.
>> 
>> There are a few remaining references to the case-independent string "fdlibm" 
>> in the make directory and HotSpot sources. HotSpot contains a partial fork 
>> for FDLIBM (a tine of FDLIBM?) to use for intrinsics. The remaining make 
>> machinery contains logic to determine what set of gcc options can be used 
>> for the compile.
>> 
>> The intention of this change is to remove use of FDLIBM for the core 
>> libraries.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 20 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk into JDK-8302801-expr
>  - Respond to review feedback.
>  - Respond to review feedback and add description of transliteration process.
>  - JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/FdLibm.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/FdLibm.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/FdLibm.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/FdLibm.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/FdLibm.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/FdLibm.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1bb39a95...437a8fce

I don't have any other comments on this, looks good.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12821

Reply via email to