On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:16:51 GMT, David M. Lloyd <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. >> This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name >> and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant >> work, this also impacts build reproducibility for native image generators >> which might already have a strategy to cope with hidden classes but cannot >> cope with indeterminate definition order for lambda proxy classes. >> >> This solves JDK-8292914 by making lambda proxy names always be stable >> without any configuration needed. This would also replace #10024. > > David M. Lloyd has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Remove final keyword Ah, I see there's an integration blocker because the bug doesn't match the title of the PR. Should I: * Open a new bug and change the PR title * Change the PR title to (inaccurately IMO) match the title of the bug * Change the bug summary to match the PR * Something else? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12579
