On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This > means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and > avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, > this also impacts build reproducibility for native image generators which > might already have a strategy to cope with hidden classes but cannot cope > with indeterminate definition order for lambda proxy classes. > > This solves JDK-8292914 by making lambda proxy names always be stable without > any configuration needed. This would also replace #10024. While I agree with your assessment that this is a much less intrusive solution to JDK-8292914 than the proposed system property, I also take Mandy's concern seriously here. I suspect that as Leyden progresses, there will be multiple issues we may want to consider in various bootstrap implementations to make them more amenable to time-shifting. I propose that we leave this PR on the table to be considered when we take up the issue more holistically, rather than doing it in bits and pieces? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12579
