On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:05:06 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <qa...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Tagir F. Valeev has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Comments in tests > > Just a small point: > >> Using similar approach in other cases (e.g. `float clamp(double, float, >> float))` may cause accidental precision loss even if the value is within >> range > > May I ask at which values of the parameters does this occur? AFAIU, every > `float` may be represented exactly by a `double`, which is the same situation > with `long` and `int`. @merykitty That clamp method would round a `double` to a `float`, an accidental precision loss. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12428
